Falling production costs: what Fosway’s 2026 AI data means for buyers
My, how time flies! Vendors have been selling AI in corporate learning for three years.
Does the LMS still have a place?
For the better part of a decade, L&D has argued the same question: does the LMS still have a place?
Five steps to modernizing your learning ecosystem, according to analysts
Corporate training is worth $400 billion a year. And it still isn’t producing what companies need.
When learning comes to you, the friction falls away
Come across something at work you don’t know how to do, and the same pattern tends to follow.
Most training stops right where skill begins
Most L&D dashboards tell a reassuring story. Completion and satisfaction scores run high, and the quarter shows a healthy count of programs delivered. Read only the reporting and you’d assume the workforce was performing better every month.
Employees value learning and still don’t use it. The problem is where it lives.
Workplace learning usually sits in a system separate from the work. That separation, not the content or the learner, is why it goes unused.
L&D has three new roles to choose from, because content was never the real job.
The Transformation Triangle, the AI in L&D report from Donald H Taylor and Eglė Vinauskaitė, makes the case that content is no longer what makes L&D valuable.
Content got cheaper. We think that’s good news for L&D.
The new AI in L&D report from Donald H Taylor and Eglė Vinauskaitė, The Transformation Triangle, makes an argument that lands hard if your job is building learning.
Faster content won’t get L&D out of the cost center.
There’s a conversation about AI in L&D that keeps coming back to production. How much faster can we build courses, how many modules can we ship in a week, how much can we cut from the development cycle.
The craft behind technical training video that builds skills
Five working principles for successful video production at scale.
